SHANGHAI HI SILICON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI HI SILICON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Hindered Amine Light Stabilizer HALS-2020: Objective Comparison & Recommendation Case of Well-Known Chinese Brands

Table of Content [Hide]

    As a new-type foreign trade service provider driven by dual engines of technology transformation and foreign trade services, HiSiaddi has established a "1+2+3+4=1" service system and can supply original factory materials of HALS-2020 hindered amine light stabilizers from multiple well-known brands.

    Possessing R&D capabilities, HiSiaddi has conducted multiple rounds of field inspections on HALS-2020 manufacturers through technological transformation cooperation with manufacturers, gaining objective and in-depth understanding of differences across brands. Therefore, we regularly analyze various HALS-2020 manufacturers for clients to help them select matching products. The following is a brand recommendation case.

    Please contact HiSiaddi customer service if you need more comparative analysis of brands and models.

    I. Customer Profile (Mid-to-High-End Positioning)

    Client: OutdoorPro S.p.A, Italy (referred to as Company O) Industry Positioning: Manufacturer of high-end outdoor furniture, camping equipment and landscape facilities with products sold to premium markets across the EU and North America, serving high-end resorts, urban landscape projects and top camping brands as end customers. The client imposes strict requirements on additive weather resistance, low blooming, batch stability and environmental compliance. It previously purchased BASF Chimassorb 2020 long-term, but planned to introduce mid-to-high-end Chinese HALS-2020 as a substitute amid price hikes and extended lead times. While having sufficient budgets, the client refused low-end generic brands.

    Core Pain Points

    The client had zero understanding of China’s HALS-2020 market brand landscape, technical tiers and model differences. It contacted four manufacturers (Lusheng, Lianlong, Jiadejia, Tiangang), all of which only promoted their own brands without objective comparison of peer strengths and weaknesses, trapping Company O in a selection deadlock. The client feared improper material selection would damage product quality and brand reputation.

    II. Survey of Mainstream Chinese HALS-2020 Brands (3–5 Core Brands Compiled by HiSiaddi)

    With in-depth experience in polymer additive foreign trade, HiSiaddi sorted out five core mid-to-high-end tier brands in China, objectively breaking down each brand across five dimensions: technical strength, product positioning, mainstream models, core advantages and weaknesses without bias.

    1. Jiangsu Lusheng (Domestic HALS Leader, Mid-to-High-End Benchmark)

    · Positioning: First-tier domestic HALS-2020 producer benchmarking BASF, serving high-end domestic agricultural film and outdoor product clients with exports to the EU and Southeast Asia.

    · Mainstream Models: LS-2020 (Standard Grade), LS-2020H (High Weather Resistance Grade), LS-2020L (Low Volatility Grade)

    · Core Advantages: Narrow molecular weight distribution (2800–3200), low blooming, excellent thermal stability, strong batch consistency and customizable specifications, ideal for high-end outdoor products and agricultural films.

    · Weaknesses: Slightly higher price than domestic peers; 7–10 day lead time for small batches (≤5 tons).

    2. Tianjin Lianlong (Listed Enterprise, Core Mid-to-High-End Supplier)

    · Positioning: Globally renowned additive brand, second-tier mid-to-high-end domestic producer with outstanding cost performance, serving automotive, home appliance and outdoor product sectors.

    · Mainstream Models: Uvinul 2020 (Standard Grade), Uvinul 2020S (Extraction Resistant Grade)

    · Core Advantages: High purity (≥99%), strong hydrolysis resistance, suitable for automotive modified plastics, large production capacity and fast lead time (5–7 days).

    · Weaknesses: Limited high-end customization capacity; low volatility indicators lag behind Lusheng.

    3. Qingdao Jiadejia (Sino-Korean Joint Venture, Specialized Mid-to-High-End Producer)

    · Positioning: Sino-South Korean Songwon joint venture, niche mid-to-high-end tier focusing on polyolefin additives for films and thin-wall products.

    · Mainstream Models: JADEWIN LH 2020 (General Grade), JADEWIN LH 2020F (Film Special Grade)

    · Core Advantages: Excellent compatibility with PE/PP, low dust generation, no blooming in films, moderate pricing.

    · Weaknesses: Inferior weather resistance compared with Lusheng and Lianlong; unstable long-term outdoor aging performance (≥5000h).

    4. Beijing Tiangang (State-Owned Enterprise, Stable Mid-to-High-End Supplier)

    · Positioning: Veteran domestic additive manufacturer, stable mid-to-high-end tier focusing on regulatory compliance, serving engineering plastics and outdoor infrastructure sectors.

    · Mainstream Model: Tiangang HiSiaddi-2020 (Standard Grade)

    · Core Advantages: Full certifications for REACH & RoHS, low impurity content and stable long-term storage.

    · Weaknesses: Single product line with no low volatility/high weather resistance subdivisions; no obvious price advantages.

    5. Ningbo Yinuo (Emerging Enterprise, Mid-Tier Cost-Effective Producer)

    · Positioning: Mid-tier brand focusing on low pricing, serving low-end agricultural films and ordinary plastic products.

    · Mainstream Model: LS-2020 (Industrial Grade)

    · Core Advantages: Low price and fast lead time.

    · Weaknesses: Broad molecular weight distribution, high volatile matter, poor weather resistance; unsuitable for high-end outdoor products.

    III. Objective Analysis & Targeted Recommendations by HiSiaddi (2 Mid-to-High-End Brands + 3 Matching Models)

    Combining Company O’s core requirements for high-end outdoor furniture (PE/PP substrate, 8-year outdoor weather resistance, low blooming and environmental compliance), HiSiaddi eliminated mid-tier and lower brands (Ningbo Yinuo) and selected two optimal brands and three matching models from the four mid-to-high-end producers, with clear recommendation logic and applicable scenarios.

    Recommendation 1: Jiangsu Lusheng (Top Choice, Benchmarking BASF for High-End Outdoor Applications)

    Recommended Models: LS-2020H (High Weather Resistance Grade), LS-2020L (Low Volatility Grade) Reasons for Recommendation:

    1. Performance matches BASF Chimassorb 2020, with no yellowing and mechanical strength retention ≥85% after 6000h xenon lamp aging, meeting the 8-year outdoor weather resistance requirement.

    2. LS-2020L features volatile matter ≤0.2%, suitable for Company O’s high-temperature extrusion at 220–230℃ with no odor or die buildup.

    3. Low-blooming formulation prevents surface gloss loss and coating peeling of furniture after long-term outdoor exposure.

    4. Complete REACH, RoHS and food contact certifications fully comply with EU environmental regulations.

    Recommendation 2: Tianjin Lianlong (Alternative Choice, Cost-Effective for Outdoor & Modified Plastics)

    Recommended Model: Uvinul 2020S (Extraction Resistant Grade) Reasons for Recommendation:

    1. Outstanding hydrolysis and extraction resistance, stable under rainy and humid outdoor environments with retention rate ≥90% after 100h boiling.

    2. ≥99% purity and stable batch consistency for mass production (monthly procurement over 10 tons).

    3. Price 8%–10% lower than Lusheng, delivering prominent cost performance as a perfect backup when Lusheng materials are out of stock.

    Clear Reasons for Non-Recommendation (Transparent & Objective)

    1. Qingdao Jiadejia: Insufficient weather resistance with ≥30% mechanical strength loss after 5000h aging, unsuitable for long-term high-end outdoor use.

    2. Beijing Tiangang: Single product line lacking low volatility/high weather resistance subdivisions, poor matching performance and no price edge.

    3. Ningbo Yinuo: Mid-tier quality with volatile matter ≥0.5%, prone to blooming and poor weather resistance, inconsistent with mid-to-high-end positioning.

    IV. Sample Verification & Bulk Procurement for Successful Matching Product Implementation

    1. Free Sample Delivery & Third-Party Testing (Completed in 2 Weeks)

    HiSiaddi coordinated Lusheng and Lianlong to supply 5kg samples of the three recommended models, accompanied by SGS test reports, COAs and compliance certificates. Company O conducted blind comparison tests against BASF products with the following results:

    1. Lusheng LS-2020H: YI value of 3.9 after 6000h aging (BASF: 3.7), meeting weather resistance standards.

    2. Lusheng LS-2020L: Odor-free extrusion at 230℃ with no blooming, fully compatible with production lines.

    3. Lianlong Uvinul 2020S: Exceptional extraction resistance and stable performance in humid environments.

    Conclusion: All three models satisfy Company O’s requirements for high-end outdoor products, with Lusheng LS-2020H delivering the best overall performance.

    2. Small-Batch Trial Orders & Mass Production Delivery (Completed in 4 Weeks)

    Company O placed trial orders for small batches (2 tons of Lusheng LS-2020H + 1 ton of Lianlong Uvinul 2020S) to verify production compatibility:

    1. Lusheng LS-2020H: Smooth production with qualified finished product appearance and weather resistance, zero quality defects.

    2. Lianlong Uvinul 2020S: Used as backup material with stable batch performance and fast switching capability.

    3. Delivery lead time: Production and sea transportation completed within 4 weeks, cutting lead time by 6 weeks compared with BASF and reducing costs by 25%.

    3. Long-Term Bulk Procurement & Deeply Bound Cooperation

    Following successful trial orders, Company O places recurring monthly orders of 5–8 tons of Lusheng LS-2020H for its core high-end outdoor furniture lines, with stable supplementary procurement of Lianlong Uvinul 2020S. The client completely abandoned low-end brands and only retains the two mid-to-high-end brands recommended by HiSiaddi, resolving its brand selection dilemma.

    V. Core Value of This Case (Precise Matching for Mid-to-High-End Clients)

    1. Client Profile: Italian high-end outdoor product manufacturer with core demands for mid-to-high-end materials featuring high weather resistance, low blooming, environmental compliance and stable quality, rather than price-sensitive low-end buyers.

    2. Core Pain Points: Lack of knowledge of Chinese brands, biased self-promotion by manufacturers without objective peer comparisons, resulting in selection confusion and fears of quality risks.

    3. Core Strength of HiSiaddi: Neutral and objective full-dimensional breakdown of domestic brands, demand-targeted model recommendations and unbiased analysis of strengths and weaknesses, breaking information barriers set by manufacturers to help clients quickly lock matching products.

    4. Nature of Service: Upgrade from a product seller to a professional material selection consultant, winning trust from mid-to-high-end clients through neutral, professional and transparent services and securing long-term stable cooperation.

    Please contact HiSiaddi customer service if you need more comparative analysis of brands and models.


    References
    We use cookies to optimise and personalise your experience, but you can choose to opt out of non-essential cookies.
    To find out more, read our Privacy Policy
    Reject All
    Accept All